Dr. Mike Licona ( @MikeLiconaOfficial ) joins us to discuss the historicity of the resurrection, why there are differences in the Gospels, and biblical inerrancy. Video version here: https://youtu.be/rbspN8Fsbrw
TIMESTAMPS
00:28-05:38 What is the current state of resurrection research?
05:38-07:35 What is the minimal facts approach and how has it evolved?
07:35-09:53 How does the “minimal” approach compare to the “maximalist” approach?
09:53-14:18 What are the “minimal facts” and which is the strongest attested?
14:18-16:36 What is the strangest evidence for the resurrection?
16:36-17:40 What is the strangest alternative hypothesis to the resurrection?
17:40-29:00 What’s the deal with Matthew’s zombies?
29:00-38:23 What does it mean to say the Bible is inspired and/or inerrant?
38:23-41:14 How does God’s providence of the text affect our view of God’s providence in our lives?
41:14-51:05 Why are there differences in the Gospels?
51:05-52:13 How to you respond to your critics who say you deny inerrancy?
52:13-58:25 Does the compositional device of displacement address the question of the delay of Jesus’s second coming?
58:25-1:05:52 What do you think about the latest stir over Genesis 1-11 and William Lane Craig’s new book?
1:05:52 How early is the material in the Pauline epistles?
LINKS
Mike Licona’s YouTube channel and interview with William Lane Craig : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc1ekr03KVA
DISCLAIMER
Think Theism is produced in associate with Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, however the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and critical thought about challenging questions.
